Our verdict

We found that the Skechers Max Cushioning Arch Fit is ideal for everyday walking and athleisure. It really made us feel comfortable and confident from sunrise to sunset. If you have flat feet and/or overpronation, its Arch Fit design makes sure that your feet won't ever stop you! We think that this Skechers shoe has the potential of a go-to if you love the extra height (think 36 mm off the ground!).

Schuhe SKECHERS Twisted Fortune 12614 GYMN Gray Mint Pros

  • Highly breathable
  • Outstandingly durable
  • Tons of cushioning
  • Skechers Weekendtas in zwart
  • Кроссовки SKECHERS Tone-ups Run 25 см
  • Skechers Go Run Trail Altitude-River Rocks
  • Comfortable in-shoe feel
  • Skechers Wild Streets

Schuhe SKECHERS Twisted Fortune 12614 GYMN Gray Mint Cons

  • Heavier than average
  • Кросівки skechers d lites fresh start

Audience verdict

90
Great!

Who should buy

We highly recommend the Skechers Max Cushioning Arch Fit if you are after the following:

  • A shoe that stays comfortable all-day
  • Skechers A Line
  • Skechers d-lites biggest fan 11930-bkw 
  • Кросівки skechers black

Skechers Max Cushioning Arch Fit who should buy

Who should NOT buy

If you don't have flat feet and don't experience excessive inward rolling of your ankles, then you may not need as much arch support. Instead, you may prefer мужские кроссовки skechers Trainers SKECHERS Clean Life 113537 NAT Natural.

And if you want a super flexible pair, the Skechers Summits might just be what you're looking for!

Skechers Max Cushioning Arch Fit who should not buy

Breathability

We decided to wear this shoe on a warm summer day... and boy were we right! So when the Skechers Max Cushioning Arch Fit got an incredibly high score of 4 out of 5 on our breathability test, we weren't even that surprised.

What we did was pump smoke through the upper of the shoe to check how much of it came through the material. And this mesh-covered pair did amazing!

For reference, let's have a look at the Trainers SKECHERS Clean Life 113537 NAT Natural (on the right), which scored a 2/5 on this same test. We can see how big the difference is!

Skechers Max Cushioning Arch Fit (on the left) vs. Trainers SKECHERS Clean Life 113537 NAT Natural (on the right)

Schuhe SKECHERS Twisted Fortune 12614 GYMN Gray Mint!

Skechers Max Cushioning Arch Fit Breathability

Looking at the upper through our microscope, we could see the woven fabric is thin and has small gaps which definitely help the air come in and out.

Skechers Max Cushioning Arch Fit Breathability

These gaps also light up when we put the shoe's upper against the light in our transparency test below.

Test results
Max Cushioning Arch Fit 4
Average 2.8
Compared to 26 walking shoes
Number of shoes
1
Breathability
5

Durability

Toebox durability

Following the previous results in our breathability test, we did not think the Skechers Max Cushioning Arch Fit would be the toughest soldier out there, but... we were totally wrong!

After 4 seconds of drilling its toebox with a Dremel, the tool only damaged the top layer of the upper. We gave it a 3 out of 5, and for a pair with such a level of breathability, this is a really good score!

Skechers Max Cushioning Arch Fit Toebox durability

If we Leather this shoe's durability with the On Cloudrift's, we can easily see that the Dremel damaged the second pair way more. So we gave it a 1 out of 5 in this same test.

Which is crazy, by the way! The Max Cushioning Arch Fit is not only more durable, but also cheaper: the On Cloudrift costs $35 more!

Skechers Max Cushioning Arch Fit vs On Cloudrift Toebox durability

Skechers Max Cushioning Arch Fit (3/5) vs. On Cloudrift (1/5)

Test results
Max Cushioning Arch Fit 3
Average 3
Compared to 20 walking shoes
Number of shoes
1
Toebox durability
5

Footwear SKECHERS Air Element 2.0 149062W BKW Black White

But check this out... the heel pad did even better! We used our Dremel to test out its durability level, and this pair showed way less damage than usual.

Even though it's a pretty sensitive spot for walking shoes, the Skechers Max Cushioning Arch Fit stood up for the test wonderfully, earning a well-deserved 4/5!

Skechers Max Cushioning Arch Fit Footwear SKECHERS Air Element 2.0 149062W BKW Black White

Test results
Max Cushioning Arch Fit 4
Average 2
Compared to 19 walking shoes
Number of shoes
1
Footwear SKECHERS Air Element 2.0 149062W BKW Black White
5

Outsole hardness

If we look at the bottom of the shoe, we can see that it doesn't have a full-length rubber outsole. Usually, this would make you go: "Ah, it must not be that durable then". Well, with this jack-in-the-box pair, you might as well think again!

The high-abrasion areas are covered and protected, and let us tell you... its sole is so damn hard for a walking shoe!

After measuring its hardness with a durometer, we could finally put our feelings into numbers, as it scored 80.6 HC. This means it is 11 % harder than average!

Skechers Max Cushioning Arch Fit Outsole hardness

But we're not done here. Many Skechers models don't even have rubber soles in the first place, only exposed foam! So the Skechers Max Cushioning Arch Fit's sole is wonderfully tougher.

Harder rubbers and better longevity go hand in hand, which is fantastic, but this also implies that the shoe will be heavier.

Test results
Max Cushioning Arch Fit 80.6 HC
Average 75.8 HC
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.
Compared to 26 walking shoes
Number of shoes
50.1 HC
Outsole hardness
92.0 HC

Schuhe SKECHERS Twisted Fortune 12614 GYMN Gray Mint | Outsole durability

And, apparently, its hardness was enough for the shoe to resist our Dremel's attack! After drilling the material for 22 seconds at a speed of 10K RPM, the damage wasn't even close to what other pairs suffered.

To understand it better, we used a tread gauge to measure the depth of the damage, and it was only 0.2 mm deep! Just by saying that the hiking boots that we've tested got around 1mm of damage should be enough to make clear how impressive this score is!

The Skechers Max Cushioning Arch Fit's insanely durable sole will stand strong even when the cushioning is gone and the upper is torn. It's pretty much invincible!

Skechers Max Cushioning Arch Fit Outsole durability

Test results
Max Cushioning Arch Fit 0.2 mm
Average 1.4 mm
Compared to 19 walking shoes
Number of shoes
0.0 mm
Outsole wear
2.0 mm

Outsole thickness

Using a caliper, we measured the outsole thickness at 2.9, which is the same number as the average for this type of shoes.

Skechers Max Cushioning Arch Fit Outsole thickness

Test results
Max Cushioning Arch Fit 2.9 mm
Average 2.6 mm
Compared to 26 walking shoes
Number of shoes
0.0 mm
Outsole thickness
5.9 mm

Weight

As we expected, all this durability comes with a price. Weighing the Skechers Max Cushioning Arch Fit on a scale, we got 11.0 oz (312.0g) in a women's US size 11. It is about 2 oz heavier than average, so forget about walking feeling like you've got no shoes on!

Skechers Max Cushioning Arch Fit Weight

Test results
Max Cushioning Arch Fit 11.01 oz (312g)
Average 9.59 oz (272g)
Compared to 26 walking shoes
Number of shoes
6.17 oz (175g)
Weight
14.25 oz (404g)

Cushioning

Heel stack

After testing them in and out of our lab, we understood why this shoe has Max Cushioning on its name...

...becazapatillas de running Skechers constitución ligera talla 43 rojas!

Using a caliper to measure its stack height, we got 36.0 mm in the heel! This is 4.7 taller than average, which means that your feet will enjoy a highly cushioned ride. Time to walk on clouds!

Skechers Max Cushioning Arch Fit Heel stack

Test results
Max Cushioning Arch Fit 36.0 mm
Average 32.6 mm
Compared to 26 walking shoes
Number of shoes
11.2 mm
Heel stack
45.7 mm

Forefoot stack

Following the heel's lead, the forefoot also has a good amount of cushioning. When we measured the forefoot of this pair, we found its stack height to be 27.4 mm!

This left us in awe, as it's even more cushioning than some walking shoes have in their heels! So there's not a single spot where the Skechers Max Cushioning Arch Fit lack support.

Skechers Max Cushioning Arch Fit Forefoot stack

Test results
Max Cushioning Arch Fit 27.4 mm
Average 21.7 mm
Compared to 26 walking shoes
Number of shoes
5.5 mm
Forefoot stack
31.2 mm

Drop

Comparing the difference between the stack heights previously mentioned, we got a heel-to-toe drop of 8.6 mm.

Skechers Max Cushioning Arch Fit Drop

This is 1.7 mm lower than average! But it was still high enough to keep our heels protected from impact when taking a step.

Test results
Max Cushioning Arch Fit 8.6 mm
Average 11.0 mm
Compared to 26 walking shoes
Number of shoes
5.7 mm
Drop
21.4 mm

Midsole softness

Note: a low durometer measurement equals a soft material, whereas a high measurement means it's firm.

Using our durometer, we measured the shoe's foam at 17.0 HA. That number might not seem like much, but hear us out, this means that it's 50% softer than average! Unbelievable!

Skechers Max Cushioning Arch Fit Midsole softness

Saying that it feels like you're walking on marshmallows is the closer we can get to describing the amount of plush these shoes have! This is all thanks to Skechers' Sandale SKECHERS Chart Topper 33218 WHT White.

local_video src="https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/37629/skechers-max-cushioning-arch-fit-midsole-softness-in-the-forefoot.mp4"]

Test results
Max Cushioning Arch Fit 17.0 HA
Average 25.0 HA
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.
Compared to 26 walking shoes
Number of shoes
7.8 HA
Midsole softness (soft to firm)
32.9 HA

Sneakers SKECHERS Homespun 12963 NVPK Navy Pink

It was pretty cool to find out that the Skechers Max Cushioning Arch Fit won't become a brick when marat comes!

After keeping the shoe in our freezer for 20 minutes and repeating the measurement, our durometer showed 23.4 HA. This means its foam is, once again, 50 % softer than average! Even when it's "frozen!" Another incredible score for this pair.

Skechers Max Cushioning Arch Fit Sneakers SKECHERS Homespun 12963 NVPK Navy Pink

When we exposed the Skechers Max Cushioning Arch Fit to a low temperature, its midsole became 37.5% firmer, which is quite close to the average!

Test results
Max Cushioning Arch Fit 37.5%
Average 33.2%
Compared to 26 walking shoes
Number of shoes
0%
Sneakers SKECHERS Homespun 12963 NVPK Navy Pink
100%

Insole thickness

This pair comes with a renowned Ortholite insole, which adds an extra layer of padding, boosting the general comfort levels. We measured its thickness at 5.4 mm, which is pretty standard for a walking shoe.

Skechers Max Cushioning Arch Fit Insole thickness

Test results
Max Cushioning Arch Fit 5.4 mm
Average 5.8 mm
Compared to 26 walking shoes
Number of shoes
3.5 mm
Insole thickness
10.3 mm

Stability

Skechers Stamina Marathon Running Shoes Sneakers 51286-NVBK

If you see "Arch Fit" written on a Skechers shoe... get ready for tons of arch support!

Skechers Max Cushioning Arch Fit midsole branding

Even for our neutral feet we felt that it was highly supportive. So, flat-footed pals, this is your conflicting day!

Torsional rigidity

Given that it's built around support, the Skechers Max Cushioning Arch Fit is not as flexible as many other walking shoes. In fact, it scored a 4/5 on our twisting test!

Skechers also utilized an engineered cushioning system to prevent ankle rolling GoWalk 6 scored only 1/5! Super-duper flexible!

This means that this pair is way more rigid than what's normal in its category. Great news for people who are looking for stability in their new shoes!

Test results
Max Cushioning Arch Fit 4
Average 2.7
Compared to 26 walking shoes
Number of shoes
1
Torsional rigidity
5

Skechers 2.0 Micro Burst Nice Form Shoes Womens

Unlike most stability shoes, the back of the Skechers Max Cushioning Arch Fit was pretty pliable.

Rating its stiffness with a 2 out of 5, which is literally just 1 point away from the most flexible measurement, we found that the heel counter is quite comfortable and will definitely be gentle with your ankles.

Test results
Max Cushioning Arch Fit 2
Average 2.2
Compared to 26 walking shoes
Number of shoes
1
Skechers 2.0 Micro Burst Nice Form Shoes Womens
5

buy skechers youth monster

The amazingly wide landing surface of this pair improves its stability. Measuring the widest part of the sole in the forefoot, we got 116.1 mm, 6% wider than average!

This might not sound like much at the beginning, but what if we told you that there are less than a dozen walking shoes that we can think of that are this wide? Exactly!

Skechers Max Cushioning Arch Fit buy skechers youth monster

Test results
Max Cushioning Arch Fit 116.1 mm
Average 111.4 mm
Compared to 26 walking shoes
Number of shoes
98.8 mm
buy skechers youth monster
124.1 mm

Midsole width in the heel

We also measured the widest part of the heel, and our caliper showed an impressive reading of 96.9 mm. It's way wider than average, and having a wider area to land is always good to feel surefooted!

Skechers Max Cushioning Arch Fit Midsole width in the heel

Test results
Max Cushioning Arch Fit 96.9 mm
Average 89.5 mm
Compared to 26 walking shoes
Number of shoes
75.6 mm
Midsole width in the heel
102.2 mm

Flexibility

Stiffness

We perform our stiffness test with a force gauge. In this case, it took 21.5N to bend this shoe to a 90-degree angle, which means it is 20% stiffer than average.

We weren't really surprised to find this out. As this model is stability-oriented, it compromises some freedom of movement to keep your feet well-supported.

Test results
Max Cushioning Arch Fit 21.5N
Average 20.4N
Skechers Irvin Hamell.
Compared to 26 walking shoes
Number of shoes
1.1N
Stiffness
52.7N

Difference in stiffness in cold

As expected, after being exposed to low temperatures (our freezer) for 20 minutes, this shoe became even stiffer, at 25.9N according to our force gauge.

The good part of this shoe already being pretty stiff is that we didn't really notice the difference that much before and after our cold test when we put it on.

It stiffened up 20.5%, which is not that much if we Leather it with the average: 64.7%!

Test results
Max Cushioning Arch Fit 20.5%
Average 52.2%
Compared to 26 walking shoes
Number of shoes
0%
Difference in stiffness in cold
139%

Grip / Traction

When we wore the Skechers Max Cushioning Arch Fit, we realized that the Goodyear rubber-equipped zapatillas de running Skechers neutro maratón talla 42.5.

We tested it on a variety of urban surfaces, like concrete, tiles, wooden boardwalks... and it was incredibly grippy!

Skechers Slipon Quick Lapse!

Skechers Max Cushioning Arch Fit grip

Size and fit

Internal length

Skechers Max Cushioning Arch Fit Internal length

Schuhe SKECHERS Twisted Fortune 12614 GYMN Gray Mint

We measured the widest part of the Skechers Max Cushioning Arch Fit's toebox at 99.2 mm, which is pretty close to the average of our tested walking shoes.

Skechers Max Cushioning Arch Fit Schuhe SKECHERS Twisted Fortune 12614 GYMN Gray Mint

Test results
Max Cushioning Arch Fit 99.2 mm
Average 98.5 mm
Compared to 26 walking shoes
Number of shoes
89.5 mm
Schuhe SKECHERS Twisted Fortune 12614 GYMN Gray Mint
103.1 mm

Schuhe SKECHERS Twisted Fortune 12614 GYMN Gray Mint | Кросівки skechers bobs squad

Then, we checked the width of this shoe on the big toe. With its 76.4 mm, it's quite close to the average, so we can't really say it's pointy.

Actually, we can definitely recommend it to people with medium-wide feet, as it's available in Wide and Extra-Wide for those who need more space for their toes. It definitely earns some extra points for that!

Skechers Max Cushioning Arch Fit Кросівки skechers bobs squad

Test results
Max Cushioning Arch Fit 76.4 mm
Average 77.5 mm
Compared to 21 walking shoes
Number of shoes
73.7 mm
Кросівки skechers bobs squad
82.0 mm

Tongue: gusset type

As we can see in the picture, there are no gussets on the tongue, and it's not attached to the sides of the upper either.

This might make you think that the tongue is going to be dancing around freely, but not at all! It stayed in place during our whole wear test.

Skechers Max Cushioning Arch Fit Tongue: gusset type

Test results
Max Cushioning Arch Fit None

Comfort

Tongue padding

Measuring its thickness, our caliper showed 4.5 mm, which means it's 13% thicker than the average. You don't need to worry about any hotspots there!

Skechers Max Cushioning Arch Fit Tongue padding

Test results
Max Cushioning Arch Fit 4.5 mm
Average 4.9 mm
Compared to 26 walking shoes
Number of shoes
0.3 mm
Tongue padding
11.5 mm

Heel tab

The finger loop that this pair has at the back makes it easier to put on.

Skechers Max Cushioning Arch Fit Heel tab

Test results
Max Cushioning Arch Fit Finger loop

Removable insole

It comes with a removable insole, which is great news for anyone who wants to wear their own orthotics!

Skechers Max Cushioning Arch Fit Removable insole

Test results
Max Cushioning Arch Fit Yes

Misc

Reflective elements

There are no reflective elements on the Skechers Max Cushioning Arch Fit.

Skechers Max Cushioning Arch Fit Reflective elements

Test results
Max Cushioning Arch Fit No